Volume 35

Issue 3

The Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention—2011
821REFLECTIONS ON HOSANNA-TABORMichael McConnell
839HOSANNA-TABOR AND THE MINISTERIAL EXCEPTIONDouglas Laycock
863MEET THE NEW BOSS: CONTINUITY IN PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS?Michael D. Ramsey
Fourth Annual Rosenkranz Debate
Resolved: Congress Acted Within Its Authority in Enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
873THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: SWIMMING IN THE STREAM OF COMMERCELaurence H. Tribe
887THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF FEDERAL POWERPaul Clement
Articles
897THE AVAILABILITY OF COMMON LAW PRIVILEGES FOR WITNESSES IN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONSMichael D. Bopp & DeLisa Lay
933THE ETHICS OF OPPOSING CERTIORARI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURTAaron Tang
Note
797ARBITRATION, CLASS WAIVERS, AND STATUTORY RIGHTS

Issue 2

Law in an Age of Austerity
453FISCAL POLICY IN AN ERA OF AUSTERITYDavid M. Schizer
487THE REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT TO INDEX CAPITAL GAINS FOR INFLATION: A SEQUALCharles J. Cooper & Vincent Colatriano
525JUDICIAL COMPULSION AND THE PUBLIC FISC—A HISTORICAL OVERVIEWKenneth T. Cuccinelli II, E. Duncan Getchell Jr., & Wesley G. Russell Jr.
543REDUCING THE DRUG WAR’S DAMAGE TO GOVERNMENT BUDGETSDavid B. Kopel & Trevor Burrus
569PAPERS, PLEASE: DOES THE CONSTITUTION PERMIT THE STATES A ROLE IN IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT?John C. Eastman
593ITS HOUR COME ROUND AT LAST? STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE GREAT STATE DEBT CRISIS OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURYErnest A. Young
933THE ETHICS OF OPPOSING CERTIORARI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURTAaron Tang
Symposium on Judicial Independence
623JUDICIAL SELECTION RECONSIDERED: A PLEA FOR RADICAL MODERATIONCharles Gardner Geyh
643CONTESTING THE JUDICIAL POWER IN THE STATESG. Alan Tarr
663IF MEN WERE ANGELSWilliam R. Casto
671CONCLUDING THOUGHTS FROM ADA, OHIOScott Douglas Gerber
Articles
681AGAINST LIABILITY FOR PRIVATE RISK-EXPOSURESheila B. Scheuerman
743A FAREWELL TO HARMS: AGAINST PRESUMING IRREPARABLE INJURY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATIONAnthony DiSarro
Note
797STARE DECISIS IN AN ORIGINALIST CONGRESS

Issue 1

The Thirtieth Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium
Capitalism, Markets, and the Constitution
I. Economic Freedoms and the Constitution
5DOES THE CONSTITUTION PROTECT ECONOMIC LIBERTY?Randy Barnett
13ECONOMIC FREEDOMS AND THE CONSTITUTIONJeffrey Rosen
II. Economic Theory, Civic Virtue, and the Meaning of the Constitution
27THE CONSTITUTION AND ECONOMIC LIBERTYJames W. Ely Jr.
37ENLIGHTENMENT ECONOMICS AND THE FRAMING OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONRenée Lettow Lerner
47JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, JUDICIAL VIRTUE, AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CONSTITUTIONNelson Lund
61THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONG. Edward White
III. Federalism and Interstate Competition
89INTERSTATE COMPETITION AND THE RACE TO THE TOPJonathan H. Adler
101FISCAL FEDERALISM AS A CONSTRAINT ON STATESClayton P. Gillette
115FEDERALISM AS A DISCOVERY PROCESS AND A CATALYST FOR HUMILITYJohn O. McGinnis
121DEPOLITICIZING FEDERALISMLouis Michael Seidman
IV. The Welfare State and American Exceptionalism
131NATIONAL HEALTHCARE AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CULTUREWilliam P. Marshall
153AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE HEALTHCARE REFORM DEBATEJeremy Rabkin
171AMERICAN DIGNITY AND HEALTHCARE REFORMNeomi Rao
V. Economic Uncertainty and the Role of the Courts
187ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTSPaul G. Mahoney
195ECONOMIC UNCERTAINY, THE COURTS, AND THE RULE OF LAWTodd Zywicki
Reflections on the Law of September 11: A Ten-Year Retrospective
213DEFERENCE TO THE EXECUTIVE IN THE UNITED STATES AFTER SEPTEMBER 11: CONGRESS, THE COURTS, AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSELEric A. Posner
245U.S. INTELLIGENCE IN THE WAKE OF SEPTEMBER 11: THE RISE OF THE SPY COMMANDO AND REORGANIZED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIESFrederick P. Hitz
Essay
259WHAT WOULD HAMILTON DO?Michael W. McConnell
Articles
283IN DEFENSE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, OR THE PROMISE OF LAWFUL RULETimothy Sandefur
351IN PRAISE OF HOSTILITY: ANTIAUTHORITARIANISM AS FREE SPEECH PRINCIPLEJohn M. Kang
Recent Developments
797STATE LAW CLAIMS AND ARTICLE III IN Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)
439MAINTAINING THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE STANDARD FOR PATENT INVALIDITY CHALLENGES IN Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, 131 S. Ct. 2238 (2011)
Scroll to Top