The Thirty-Second Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium on Law and Public Policy—2013 The Federal Leviathan: Is There Any Area of Modern Life to Which Federal Government Power Does Not Extend? |
| I. Crony Capitalism |
| 5 | CRONY CAPITALISM: RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW | Jonathan R. Macey |
| II. Environmental and Property Laws |
| 13 | THE LEGITIMATE REACH OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVOLUTION | Lynn E. Blais |
| 23 | MODERN ENVIRONMENTALISTS OVERREACH: A PLEA FOR UNDERSTANDING BACKGROUND COMMON LAW PRINCIPLES | Richard A. Epstein |
| 41 | AGAINST THE EPA, ABSURDITY IS NO DEFENSE | Jeremy A. Rabkin |
| III. Federalization of Criminal Law |
| 51 | INTENT-OPTIONAL CRIMINAL STATUTES: A PLEA FOR REFORM, AND A NOTE OF CAUTION TO REFORMERS | William G. Otis |
| 57 | THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL “CODE”: RETURN OF OVERFEDERALIZATION | Julie Rose O’Sullivan |
| IV. Limitations Attached to Federal Money |
| 71 | THE SPENDING POWER AFTER NFIB V. SEBELIUS | Lynn A. Baker |
| 83 | COERCION, CONDITIONS, AND COMMANDEERING: A BRIEF NOTE ON THE MEDICAID HOLDING OF NFIB V. SEBELIUS | Michael S. Greve |
| 93 | VIVA CONDITIONAL FEDERAL SPENDING! | Samuel R. Bagenstos |
| V. Civil Rights |
| 103 | THE SUPREME COURT’S PERVERSION OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT | Lino A. Graglia |
| 113 | THE ODD EVOLUTION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATE | R. Shep Melnick |
| Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy |
| 137 | INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY | Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz |
| 145 | THE UNEASY CASE FOR INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY | Michael Stokes Paulsen |
| 165 | TOWARD IMPROVED INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY IN LAW SCHOOLS | George W. Dent, Jr. |
| 179 | LEGAL ACADEMIA AND THE BLINDNESS OF THE ELITES | Paul Campos |
| 187 | HOW THE LAW SCHOOL CAN SUCCEED—AN INVITATION | Sherif Girgis |
| Articles |
| 199 | THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF “VACANCIES THAT MAY HAPPEN DURING THE RECESS” IN THE CONSTITUTION’S RECESS APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE | Robert G. Natelson |
| 241 | CRACK COCAINE, CONGRESSIONAL INACTION, AND EQUAL PROTECTION | Paul J. Larkin, Jr. |
| 295 | COMPLETE DIVERSITY AND THE CLOSING OF THE FEDERAL COURTS | Charles J. Cooper & Howard C. Nielson, Jr. |
| Note |
| 329 | LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD: REEXAMINING THE APPLICATION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE TO CONVEYED PARTIES | |
| Recent Developments |
| 347 | THE RETURN OF CLASSICAL POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE IN ZIVOTOFSKY EX REL. ZIVOTOFSKY V. CLINTON, 132 S. CT. 1421 (2012) | |
| 363 | A “[NON]ESSENTIAL LIMIT ON OUR POWER”: STANDING DOCTRINE AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN HOLLINGSWORTH V. PERRY, 133 S. CT. 2652 (2013) | |