By Mary Ziegler* This week, after the Supreme Court heard argument in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, it seems tricky to predict the future of abortion rights. Justice Scalia’s passing and the ambiguity of Justice Kennedy’s stand make any bet on the outcome unwise. Just the same, history can still give us a sense of what Hellerstedt could mean. The pieces of the puzzle in Hellerstedt—woman-protective arguments, TRAP laws, and a redefined undue-burden test—have been inextricably linked …
Continue Reading about Two Ways of Thinking About the Undue Burden Test After Hellerstedt →