Hidden Power in Global Supply Chains

Hidden Power in Global Supply Chains

Hidden Power in Global Supply Chains

By Trang (Mae) Nguyen

View Full Article

Most consumers are familiar with brand names like Apple, Nike, and H&M, but few have heard of the actual offshore multinational enterprises that make their products: Foxconn, Yue Yuen, TAL Apparel, and many others. This Article argues that these companies—whom I call “Big Suppliers”—represent a new crop of hidden corporate powers that have transformed the legal organization of global trade and production. In today’s “made in the world” era, transnational suppliers, not brands, are the true quarterbacks of global supply chains. As manufacturing experts, they coordinate and oversee supplier networks spanning Asia, Latin America, and beyond. Acting at once as employers, landlords, and quasiregulators, they manage the employment, housing, mobility, and social lives of millions of workers whose labor sustains global trade. Yet, legal scholarship has only begun to notice the presence of these new global capitalists.

This Article is the first to systematically unearth the hidden impact of Big Suppliers on a suite of public and private law issues, including cross-border contracts, corporate social responsibility designs, trade regulations, private regulatory functions, and beyond. It makes three principal contributions: First, it identifies a critical yet largely overlooked power shift in the economic forms of globalization, that is, the reconsolidation of global production at the level of first-tier suppliers. Second, in revealing how transnational suppliers operate in a highly enmeshed market, it complicates the influential paradigm of “buyerdriven” globalization, which has long assumed that Global North brands are the key power holders in global trade. As this Article demonstrates, the narrative of buyer hegemony rests on an incomplete assumption that buyers can effectively exert pressure on their suppliers that has long undergirded important laws and policies such as corporate social responsibility designs. Third, this Article conceptualizes “norm assembly” as a process by which transnational suppliers, by virtue of their size and scale, act as critical sites of norm contestation, diffusion, and resistance. Norm assembly may be driven by agency, but could also happen simply as a by-product of a firm’s organizational logic and economic arrangement. Ultimately, in revealing the engine under the hood of global supply chains, this Article identifies a group of new critical actors and opens up potential venues for inquiries and interventions at a moment of imminent shifts in the architecture of globalization.


Cover image credit

Empty Promises: Peacekeeper Babies and Discretionary Impunity Within the United Nations

Empty Promises: Peacekeeper Babies and Discretionary Impunity Within the United Nations

Empty Promises: Peacekeeper Babies and Discretionary Impunity Within the United Nations

By Emma Svoboda

In six decades of U.N. peacekeeping operations, the presence of U.N. military units in some of the planet’s most unstable conflict zones has led to the births of tens of thousands of Peacekeeper Fathered Children (“PKFC”). Mothers of PKFC seeking acknowledgments of paternity or child support payments have been stonewalled by the United Nations; the organization has used its legal immunities to absolve itself of any responsibility to connect abandoned children with their peacekeeper fathers. This inaction has persisted despite external and internal calls for reform and promises by U.N. leadership for new pathways to remedies. This Note sets out the problems and obstacles faced by PKFC mothers when seeking paternity claims and details the ways in which U.N. policies create a remedy gap. It additionally proffers an explanation for that paradox of inaction: the United Nations’ automatic categorization of all PKFC as instances of improper Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (“SEA”). The United Nations is temperamentally disposed to zealously exercise its legal immunities as an International Organization (“IO”) to shield itself from civil or criminal claims seeking damages for rape, sexual abuse, or other misdeeds. This Note argues that impulse may be hampering the United Nations’ ability to take ownership over civil paternity claims, even as it claims that providing remedies to PKFC and their mothers is a political priority for the organization.

Cover image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/67163702@N07/8229506972 (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Volume 64, Issue 2

FRONT MATTER

NOTE:

Bend, Don’t Break: China’s Approach to the International Human Rights Order
By Jackson Neagli


ARTICLES:

State-Academic Lawmaking
By David Hughes and Yahli Shereshevsky

Finance Against Law: The Case of China
By Shitong Qiao

The Wild West of Company-Level Grievance Mechanisms: Drawing Normative Borders to Patrol the Privatization of Human Rights Remedies
By Lisa J. Laplante

From “Space Law” to “Space Governance”: A Policy-Oriented Perspective on International Law and Outer Space Activities
By Dr. Gershon Hasin

Volume 64, Issue 1

FRONT MATTER

NOTE:

Empty Promises: Peacekeeper Babies and Discretionary Impunity Within the United Nations
By Emma Svoboda


ARTICLES:

Hidden Power in Global Supply Chains
By Trang (Mae) Nguyen

Expert Governance of Online Speech
Brenda Dvoskin

Reconceptualizing the Party-Appointed Arbitrator and the Meaning of Impartiality
Catherine A. Rogers

Courts Without Separation of Powers: The Case of Judicial Suggestions in China
By Minhao Benjamin Chen & Zhiyu Li

Volume 63, Issue 2

Front Matter

ARTICLES

A New Framework for Digital Taxation

By: Reuven Avi-Yonah, Young Ran (Christine) Kim & Karen Sam


International Anticorruption Law, Revisited

By: Jose-Miguel Bello y Villarino


The International Organization for Migration and New Global Migration Governance

By: Janie A. Chuang


Agility Over Stability: China’s Great Reversal in Regulating the Platform Economy

By: Angela Huyue Zhang


NOTE

Existential Threat or Digital Yawn: Evaluating China’s Central Bank Digital Currency

By: Jake Laband

Volume 63, Issue 1

Front Matter

Articles

“Just” Sharing: The Virtues of Digital Sequence Information Benefit-sharing for the Common Good

By: Margo A. Bagley

The Unable or Unwilling Doctrine: A View from Private Law

By: Gabriella Blum & John C. P. Goldberg

The Independence of National Focal Points Under the International Health Regulations (2005)

By: Sam Halabi & Kumanan Wilson

Japan’s Transnational War Reparations Litigation: An Empirical Analysis

By: Timothy Webster

Note

Towards a New Standard for Assessing Compensation in Cases of Collective Human Rights Violations

By: Stanisław Krawiecki