Vols. 30-34

Volume 34 – Issue 3
Volume 34 – Issue 2
Volume 34 – Issue 1
Volume 33 – Issue 3
Volume 33 – Issue 2
Volume 33 – Issue 1
Volume 32 – Issue 3
Volume 32 – Issue 2
Volume 32 – Issue 1
Volume 31 – Issue 3
Volume 31 – Issue 2
Volume 31 – Issue 1
Volume 30 – Issue 3
Volume 30 – Issue 2
Volume 30 – Issue 1

Volume 34, Number 3 – Summer 2011

	THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL LAWYERS CONVENTION — 2010
819	DIRECT DEMOCRACY: GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE?Richard A. Epstein
827	ELECTIONS MATTERMichael J. Gerhardt
837	HOW TO COUNT TO THIRTY‐FOUR: THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONMichael Stokes Paulsen
873	ENTRENCHING GOOD GOVERNMENT REFORMSMark V. Tushnet
879	THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROPOSITION 8Richard A. Epstein
	ARTICLES
889	EMBODIED EQUALITY: DEBUNKING EQUAL PROTECTION ARGUMENTS FOR ABORTION RIGHTSErika Bachiochi
951	THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL COSTJosh Blackman
1043	34_3_1043_LundMAY LAWYERS BE GIVEN THE POWER TO ELECT THOSE WHO CHOOSE OUR JUDGES? “MERIT SELECTION” AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAWNelson Lund
	NOTES
1071	WHAT’S THE HARM? NONTAXPAYER STANDING TO CHALLENGE RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
1099	WHY WE CANNOT ASK WHY: ETHICAL INDEPENDENCE AND VOTER INTENT
	RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
1117	THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF FIREARM LEGISLATION IN THE WAKE OF McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010)
1131	MACHINEGUNNING REASON: SENTENCING FACTORS AND MANDATORY MINIMUMS IN United States v. O’Brien, 130 S. Ct. 2169 (2010)

Volume 34, Number 2 – Spring 2011

	PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FIRST TWO YEARS: A LEGAL REFLECTION
421	HEAT EXPANDS ALL THINGS: THE PROLIFERATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONJonathan H. Adler
453	“ANYTHING BUT BUSH?”: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND GUANTANAMO BAYTung Yin
493	THE “FULL ACCESS DOCTRINE”: CONGRESS’S CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATIONVicki Divoll
543	PRIVATE REGULATIONRonen Avraham
	CORPORATE SPEECH AND ELECTORAL SPENDING
639	CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT BIG CORPORATIONS SHOULD HAVE BUT DO NOT WANTRichard A Epstein
663	FOREIGN NATIONALS, ELECTORAL SPENDING, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENTToni M. Massaro
	ARTICLE
705	DAMAGES UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT: SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND A CALL FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMAlex Kardon
	ESSAY
769	PROTECTING RELIGIONS FROM “DEFAMATION”: A THREAT TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDSLeonard A. Leo, Felice D. Gaer, & Elizabeth Cassidy
	NOTES
785	EVOLVING STANDARDS AS A JUDICIAL MANDATE: NECESSARY OR SUPERFLUOUS?
805	THE LOSS OF FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IN CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ, 130 S. CT. 2971 (2010)

Volume 34, Number 1 – Winter 2010

	ORIGINALISM 2.0: THE TWENTY‐NINTH ANNUAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL STUDENT SYMPOSIUM ON LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY—2010
	I. ORIGINALISM: A RATIONALIZATION FOR CONSERVATIVISM OR A PRINCIPLED THEORY OF INTERPRETATION?
5	ARE ORIGINALIST CONSTITUTIONAL THEORIES PRINCIPLED, OR ARE THEY RATIONALIZATIONS FOR CONSERVATISM?Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
29	IS ORIGINALISM TOO CONSERVATIVE?Keith E. Whittington
	II. ORIGINALISM IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: ANCIENT CHECKS OR NEWFANGLED RIGHTS?
45	TWO CHEERS, NOT THREE, FOR SIXTH AMENDMENT ORIGINALISMStephanos Bibas
53	ORIGINALISM AS AN ANCHOR FOR THE SIXTH AMENDMENTJeffrey L. Fisher
	III. ORIGINALISM AND CONSTRUCTION: DOES ORIGINALISM ALWAYS PROVIDE THE ANSWER?
65	INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTIONRandy E. Barnett
73	ORIGINALISM AND THE CONSTITUTION: DOES ORIGINALISM ALWAYS PROVIDE THE ANSWER?Lino A. Graglia
89	ORIGINALISM AND HISTORY: THE CASE OF BOUMEDIENE V. BUSHA. Raymond Randolph
99	INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION: ORIGINALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTSKermit Roosevelt III
	IV. ORIGINALISM, PRECEDENT, AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT
111	ORIGINALISM AND STARE DECISISStephen Markman
121	ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENTJohn O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport
129	ORIGINALISM, PRECEDENT, AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINTJeffrey Rosen
137	ORIGINALISM, CONSERVATIVISM, AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINTDavid A. Strauss
	V. DOES THE ORIGINALISM OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT GUARANTEE JUSTICE FOR ALL?
149	DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT GUARANTEE EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL?Steven G. Calabresi
	ESSAY
157	WAS BORK RIGHT ABOUT JUDGES?Thomas B. Griffith
	ARTICLES
171	GOOGLE AND THE LIMITS OF ANTITRUST: THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST GOOGLEGeoffrey A. Manne & Joshua D. Wright
245	WHAT IS MARRIAGE?Sherif Girgis, Robert P. George, & Ryan T. Anderson
289	SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM BY PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS AND THE RIGHTS OF DISSENTING EMPLOYEES UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENTEric John Finseth
	CODA
367	CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN GRAHAM V. FLORIDA?Richard M. Ré
	RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
377	PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER IN Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010)
393	FEDERAL “PROCEDURAL” RULES UNDERMINE IMPORTANT STATE INTERESTS IN Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 130 S. Ct. 1431 (2010)
405	REMOVING CORPORATE CAMPAIGN FINANCE RESTRICTIONS IN Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010)

Volume 33, Number 3 – Summer 2010

	THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL LAWYERS CONVENTION — 2009
907	BEING HONEST ABOUT BEING HONEST AGENTSGuido Calabresi
915	JUDGES AS HONEST AGENTSFrank H. Easterbrook
925	WHY CONSERVATIVES, AND OTHERS, HAVE TROUBLE SUPPORTING THE MEANINGFUL ENFORCEMENT OF FREE EXERCISE RIGHTSAlan Brownstein
935	FEDERALISM AND FAITH REDUXIra C. Lupu
943	RELIGION AND ITS RELATION TO LIMITED GOVERNMENTMichael W. McConnell
953	THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE WAR ON TERRORMichael B. Mukasey
	ESSAY
963	THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL JUDGE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION: SOME PERSPECTIVES FROM THE NINTH CIRCUITDiarmuid F. O’Scannlain
	ARTICLES
987	LOVE, TRUTH, AND THE ECONOMY: A REFLECTION ON BENEDICT XVI’S CARITAS IN VERITATEJohn M. Breen
1031	CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN KENNEDY V. LOUISIANA?Richard M. Ré
1107	RATIONAL PLEADING IN THE MODERN WORLD OF CIVIL LITIGATION: THE LESSONS AND PUBLIC POLICY BENEFITS OF TWOMBLY AND IQBALVictor E. Schwartz & Christopher E. Appel
	BOOK REVIEW
1151	THE ROLE OF THE FAMILY IN CRIMINAL LAW: PRIVILEGE OR PUNISHGerard V. Bradley
	RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
1177	CHEVRON’S SLIDING SCALE IN Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct. 1187 (2009)
1191	A RETREAT FROM DECISION BY RULE IN Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009)

1203THE DECLINE OF THE COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS IN Nebraska Public Power District v. United States,
590 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Volume 33, Number 2 – Spring 2010

387	WHY I WILL NEVER BE A KEYNESIANRichard A. Epstein
407	UNAFFORDABLE HOUSING AND POLITICAL KICKBACKS ROCKED THE AMERICAN ECONOMYDarrell Issa
421	CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2007–2009William Poole
443	SMITH VERSUS KEYNES: ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE POST‐CRISIS ERASamuel Gregg
465	THE BANKS VERSUS THE CONSTITUTIONRon Paul
476	STRAW MAN CAPITALISM AND A NEW PATH TO PROSPERITYStephen Moore & Tyler Grimm
487	FREEDOM AND EQUALITY IN MARKET EXCHANGE: SOME NATURAL LAW REFLECTIONSChristopher Tollefsen
495	THE CONSTITUTION AND ITS MORAL WARNINGSHadley Arkes
507	THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: MORAL FAILURE OR COGNITIVE FAILURE?Arnold Kling
519	THE CASE AGAINST THE FISCAL STIMULUSJeffrey Miron
531	CUMULATING POLICY CONSEQUENCES, FRIGHTENED OVERREACTIONS, AND THE CURRENT SURGE OF GOVERNMENT’S SIZE, SCOPE, AND POWERRobert Higgs
557	ANTITRUST IN AN ERA OF MARKET FAILUREAlan Devlin
607	FACILITATING ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH THROUGH REFORM OF THE SECURITIES CLASS‐ACTION SYSTEM: EXPLORING ARBITRATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO LITIGATIONBradley J. Bondi
639	THE DISTORTING INCENTIVES FACING THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONJonathan R. Macey
671	THE REDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC RISK IN THE UNITED STATES FINANCIAL SYSTEMHal S. Scott
735	THE SCANDAL BENEATH THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: GETTING A VIEW FROM A MORAL‐CULTURAL MENTAL MODELKevin T. Jackson
779	DOES THE STATE CREATE THE MARKET—AND SHOULD IT PURSUE EFFICIENCY?Timothy Sandefur
807	INTELLECTUAL HAZARD: HOW CONCEPTUAL BIASES IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS CONTRIBUTED TO THE CRISIS OF 2008Geoffrey P. Miller & Gerald Rosenfeld
	NOTES
841	PUBLICITY RIGHTS, FALSE ENDORSEMENT, AND THE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
863	AN INTERPRETIVE FRAMEWORK FOR NARROWER IMMUNITY UNDER SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT
885	PUNISHMENT AND STUDENT SPEECH: STRAINING THE REACH OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Volume 33, Number 1 – Winter 2010

SEPARATION OF POWERS IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISMTHE TWENTY‐EIGHTH ANNUAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL STUDENT SYMPOSIUMON LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY—2009
	*I. Is The Separation of Powers Principle Exportable?*
5	IS THE SEPARATION OF POWERS EXPORTABLE?Steven G. Calabresi & Kyle Bady
17	THE CASE FOR PROMOTING DEMOCRACY THROUGH EXPORT CONTROLOona Hathaway
	*II. Medellín v. Texas*
25	DEFENDING U.S. SOVEREIGNTY, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND FEDERALISM IN MEDELLÍN V. TEXASTed Cruz
	*III. Confirmation Battles and Presidential Nominations*
39	IN PRAISE OF SUPREME COURT FILIBUSTERSJohn O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport
47	JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: CHECKS AND BALANCES IN PRACTICERachel Brand
	*IV. The Administrative State and the Constitution*
55	BURYING THE CONSTITUTION UNDER A TARPGary Lawson
73	DELEGATION AND JUDICIAL REVIEWThomas W. Merrill
87	DECONSTRUCTING NONDELEGATIONCynthia R. Farina
103	LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATEPeter M. Shane
	*V. War Powers and the Executive*
113	THE WAR POWERMichael Stokes Paulsen
139	CLEAR STATEMENT RULES AND EXECUTIVE WAR POWERSCurtis A. Bradley
	Exchange
149	THE PUZZLE OF HAMILTON’S FEDERALIST NO. 77Seth Barrett Tillman
169	THE TRADITIONAL VIEW OF HAMILTON’S FEDERALIST NO. 77 AND AN UNEXPECTED CHALLENGE: A RESPONSE TO SETH BARRETT TILLMANJeremy D. Bailey
	Essays on Heller
185	THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS IN THE STATES: AMBIGUITY, FALSE MODESTY, AND (MAYBE) ANOTHER WIN FOR ORIGINALISMClark M. Neily III
203	SECOND AMENDMENT REDUX: SCRUTINY, INCORPORATION, AND THE HELLER PARADOXRobert A. Levy
	Articles
217	ORIGINALISM AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: TWO CASE STUDIES OF CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE IN SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKINGDouglas H. Ginsburg
239	REVIVING NECESSITY IN EMINENT DOMAINRobert C. Bird
283	THE LONELY DEATH OF PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCINGRichard M. Esenberg
	Book Review
333	A FAINT‐HEARTED LIBERTARIAN AT BEST: THE SWEET MYSTERY OF JUSTICE ANTHONY KENNEDYIlya Shapiro
	Recent Developments
361	TITLE VII’S CONFLICTING “TWIN PILLARS” IN Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658 (2009)
375	FEDERALISM BY JURY IN United States v. Fell, 571 F.3d 264 (2d Cir. 2009)

Volume 32, Number 3 – Summer 2009

THE GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION: A RETROSPECTIVE
Reflections on Events and Changes at the Department of JusticeJohn Ashcroft	813
National Security and the Rule of LawMichael B. Mukasey	831
The “Bush Doctrine”: Can Preventitive War Be Justified?Robert J. Delahunty & John Yoo	843
Public Bioethics and the Bush PresidencyO. Carter Snead	867
Speaking Up For MarriageWilliam C. Duncan	915
Faith-Based Initiative 2.0: The Bush Faith-Based and Community InitiativeStanley W. Carlson‐Thies	931
The Bush Administration and America’s International Religious Freedom PolicyThomas F. Farr & William L. Saunders, Jr.	949
Unfinished Business: The Bush Administration and Racial PreferencesRoger Clegg	971
A Measured Approach: Employment and Labor Law During the George W. Bush YearsWilliam J. Kilberg, Jason Schwartz & Joshua Chadwick	997
False Premises: The Accountability Fetish in EducationMartha Derthick & Joshua M. Dunn	1015
Essay
The Constitution as the Playbook for Judicial SelectionOrrin G. Hatch	1035
Articles
Measuring Meta-Doctrine: An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Minimalism in the Supreme CourtRobert Anderson IV	1045
Testing the Boundaries of the First Amendment Press Clause: A Proposal for Protecting the Media from Newsgathering TortsAnthony L. Fargo & Laurence B. Alexander	1093
Reconsidering the Felony Murder Rule in Light of Modern Criticisms: Doesn’t the Conclusion Depend Upon the Particular Rule at Issue?David Crump	1155
Recent Developments
Imperfect Minimalism: Unanswered Questions In Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008	1187
“Wholly Foreign to the First Amendment”: The Demise of Campaign Finance’s Equalizing Rationale In Davis v. Federal Election Commission, 128 S. Ct. 2759 (2008	1197
Squaring the Circle: Reconciling Clear Statutory Text with Contradictory Statutory Purpose In United States v. Whitley, 529 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2008)	1211

Volume 32, Number 2 – Spring 2009 AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM
THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL LAWYERS CONVENTION—2007
I. Is America Different From Other Major Democracies?
The Separation of People and State Randy E. Barnett	451
Exceptionalism in a Time of Stress Graham Wilson	455
II. The Constitution and American Exceptionalism: Citation of Foreign Law
An American Amendment Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz	475
III. American Exceptionalism, The War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World
Answering the Critics of the Legal Case for the War on Terror David B. Rivkin, Jr.	485
American Exceptionalism, the War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World Nadine Strossen	495
ESSAY
On Honor Laurence H. Silberman	503
ARTICLES
Neutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought John M. Breen	513
Restricting Experimental Use Alan Devlin	599
The Use and Abuse of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation Ganesh Sitaraman	653
Why Can’t Martha Stewart Have A Gun? C. Kevin Marshall	695
BOOK REVIEW
Exposing the Myth of Homo Economicus Ronald J. Colombo	737
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Treaties, Execution, and Originalism Medellín v. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008)	767
The Validity of Conditional Sales: Competing Views on Patent Exhaustion in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 2109 (2008)	785
Shifting Courses In Admiralty: Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008)	799

Volume 32, Number 1 – Winter 2009

THE PEOPLE & THE COURTS
The Twenty-Seventh Annual National Federalist Society Student Symposium on Law and Public Policy – 2008
I. Judicial Interference With Community Values
Judicial Review, Local Values, and Pluralism	Richard W. Garnett
Counting States	Roderick M. Hills, Jr
Voting With Your Feet Is No Substitute for Constitutional Rights	Douglas Laycock
Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, and Welfare Reform	Amy L. Wax
II. The Merits of Selecting Our Judges
The Merits of Merit Selection	Thomas R. Phillips
Merit Selection: Choosing Judges Based On Their Politics Under The Veil Of A Disarming Name	Clifford W. Taylor
III. Kelo, Grutter, and Popular Responses To Unpopular Decisions
Achieving Equal Treatment Through The Ballot Box	Ward Connerly
Political Responses To Supreme Court Decisions	Marci A. Hamilton
IV. The People’s Common Law: Is Law and Economics Anti-Democratic?
Law and Economics: Realism or Democracy?	Henry E. Smith
V. An Originalist Judge and the Media
An Interpretivist Judge and the Media	Stephen J. Markman
Limits Of Interpretivism	Richard Primus
A Response To Professor Primus	Stephen J. Markman
VI. Tradition and the People’s Constitution
Sodomy and Guns: Tradition as Democratic Deliberation and Constitutional Interpretation	William N. Eskridge, Jr
ESSAY
Tools Against Terror: All of the Above	Michael Chertoff
ARTICLES
Public Displays of Affection … For God: Religious Moments After McCreary and Van Orden	Edith Brown Clement
Manliness and the Constitution	John M. Kang
Marketing Pharmaceutical Products in the Twentyfirst Century: An Analysis of the Continued Viability of Traditional Principles of Law in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising	Victor E. Schwartz, Cary Silverman, Michael J. Hulka &Christopher E. Appel
Returning to the Pruneyard: The Unconstitutionality of State-Sanctioned Trespass in the Name of Speech	Gregory C. Sisk
BOOK REVIEW
Lessons From the Rise of Legal Conservatism	Ilya Somin
RECENT DEVELOPMENT
Inventing the “Right To Vote” in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 128 S. Ct. 1610 (2008)

Volume 31, Number 3 – Summer 2008

Foreword	Justice Antonin Scalia
A Critical Introduction to the Originalism Debate	Steven G. Calabresi
Symposium Essays On Originalism
I. Originalism and Pragmatism
Pragmatism’s Role In Interpretation	Frank H. Easterbrook
Two (More) Problems With Originalism	Larry Kramer
A Pragmatic Defense of Originalism	John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport
Originalism and Pragmatism: False Friends	Jeffrey Rosen
II. Originalism and Precedent
Text vs. Precedent In Constitutional Law	Steven G. Calabresi
On Text and Precedent	Akhil Reed Amar
Why Conservatives Shouldn’t Be Originalists	David A. Strauss
The Conservative Case For Precedent	Thomas W. Merrill
Resisting the Ratchet	Stephen J. Markman
III. The Original Meaning of the Commerce, Spending, and Necessary and Proper Clauses
A Government of Adequate Powers	Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Choice Between Madison and FDR	Randy Barnett
Articles
Paper Money and the Original Understanding of The Coinage Clause	Robert G. Natelson
The Original Meaning of the Free Exercise Clause: The Evidence From the First Congress	Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Essays
Thinking About Originalism	Charles R. Kesler
Costituting the Constitution: Understanding the American Constitution Through the British Cultural Constitution	Garrett Ward Sheldon
Note
Politics, Constitutional Interpretation, and Media Ecology: An Argument Against Judicial Minimalism
Recent DevelopmentsThe Supreme Court of the United States, 2006 Term
Reconceptualizing Split-Recovery Statutes: Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007)
Playing Lawyers: The Implications of Endowing Parents with Substantive Rights Under Idea in Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 127 S. Ct. 1994 (2007)
Avoiding Mead: The Problem with Unanimity in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, 127 S. Ct. 2339 (2007)
No Taxation Without Separation: The Supreme Court Passes on an Opportunity to End Establishment Clause Exceptionalism, Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007)

Volume 31, Number 2 – Spring 2008

Essays In Honor Of Judge Robert H. Bork
I. Competition Law and the Free Market
The Chicago School and Exlcusionary Conduct	Frank H. Easterbrook
Judge Bork, Consumer Welfare, and Antitrust Law	Douglas H. Ginsburg
The Abiding Influence of The Antitrust Paradox	George L. Priest
II. Judicial Philosophy and Originalism
Of Inkblots and Originalism: Historical Ambiguity and the Case of the Ninth Amendment	Kurt T. Lash
On the Hypothesis that Lie at the Foundations of Originalism	John Harrison
The Misunderstood Relationship Between Originalism and Popular Sovereignty	Saikrishna B. Prakash
III. Law and Culture
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s	Steven G. Calabresi
Slouching Towards Gomorrah, Revisited	Robert P. George
The Borkean Case Against Robert Bork’s Case for Censorship	Ilya Somin

Articles
Partial-Birth Abortion and the Perils of Constitutional Common Law	Robert J. Pushaw, Jr.
Demystifying the Right to Exclude: Of Property, Inviolability, and Automatic Injunctions	Shyamkrishna Balganesh

A New Architecture of Commercial Speech Law	Charles Fischette
Judicial Review of Local Land Use Decisions: Lessons from RLUIPA	Ashira Pelman Ostrow
Essay
Lopez, Morrison, and Raich: Federalism in the Rehnquist Court	Lino A. Graglia
*Book Review*
Yoo’s Labour’s Lost: Jack Goldsmith’s Nine-Month Saga in the Office of Legal Counsel	Douglas W. Kmiec