Volume 29

Issue 3

Articles
769Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure ReconsideredSteven G. Calabresi & James Lindgren
879The Ideological Stakes of Eliminating Life TenureWard Farnsworth
891The Making of a New Copyright LockeanLior Zemer
949An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage LawsDouglas W. Allen
981Toward a Basal Tenth Amendment: A Riposte to National Bank Preemption of State Consumer Protection LawsKeith R. Fisher
Address
1035Before Roe v. Wade: Judge Friendly’s Draft Abortion OpinionA. Raymond Randolph
Notes
1063Federalism on ICE: State and Local Enforcement of Federal Immigration LawDaniel Booth
1085Flexible Standards, Deferential Review: Daubert‘s Legacy of ConfusionCassandra H. Welch
Recent Cases
1107Uncovering Coherence in Compelled Subsidy of Speech Doctrine: Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n, 125 S. Ct. 2055 (2005)Mark Champoux
1119Defining the Court’s Role as Faithful Agent in Statutory Interpretation: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., 125 S. Ct. 2611 (2005)Joel Schellhammer
1133Unjustly Usurping the Parental Right: Fields v. Palmdale School District, 427 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2005)Elliott M. Davis

Issue 2

In Memoriam: William H. Rehnquist
395Chief Justice Rehnquist’s Enduring, Democratic ConstitutionRichard W. Garnett
401The Notion of a Living ConstitutionWilliam H. Rehnquist
Articles
417Seeing Government Purpose Through the Objective Observer’s Eyes: The Evolution-Intelligent Design DebatesKristi L. Bowman
491Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument for Banning Economic Development TakingsCharles E. Cohen
569Defining the Contours of the Emerging Fraudulent Misjoinder DoctrineE. Farish Percy
623The Conservative Influence of the Federalist Society on the Harvard Law School Student BodyGeorge W. Hicks, Jr.
Note
719Defending America’s Children: How the Current System Gets It WrongTracy Leigh Dodds
Recent Developments
United States Supreme Court, 2004 Term
743Good History, Good Law (and by Coincidence Good Policy Too): Granholm v. Heald, 125 S. Ct. 1885 (2005)Aaron Nielson
759Restraining Eminent Domain Through Just Compensation: Kelo v. New London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005)Brett Talley

Issue 1

Symposium: Law and Freedom
3The Nature and Importance of LibertyCharles Fried
9FreedomMichael S. Moore
27Not Necessarily in Conflict: Americans Can Be Both United and Culturally DiverseJennifer C. Braceras
33The Human Nature of Freedom and Identity–We Hold More than Random ThoughtsDouglas W. Kmiec
53Five Theses on Identity PoliticsRichard D. Parker
61News for the Libertarians: The Moral Tradition Already Contains the Libertarian PremisesHadley Arkes
73Safety and Freedom: Common Concerns for Conservatives, Libertarians, and Civil LibertariansNadine Strossen
85The Virtues of Preemptive DeterrenceDavid B. Rivkin, Jr.
Articles
103Toward the Framers’ Understanding of “Advice and Consent”: A Historical and Textual InquiryAdam J. White
149Ending the War on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay DetaineesTung Yin
213Using Information Markets to Improve Public Decision MakingRobert W. Hahn & Paul C. Tetlock
291Against Foreign LawRobert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo
Recent Developments
United States Supreme Court, 2004 Term
331Imposing Necessary Boundaries on Judicial Discretion: Clingman v. Beaver, 125 S. Ct. 2029 (2005)Lowell J. Schiller
345Placing Unnecessary Limits on Associational Freedoms and Voting Rights: Clingman v. Beaver, 125 S. Ct. 2029 (2005)M. Jason Scoggins
357Paying for the Sins of Their Users: Liability and Growing Uncertainty in a Digital Age: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)John Lobato
373Chasing Finality: Federal Collateral Relief in the Wake of Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 125 S. Ct. 1807 (2005)N. Noelle Francis
Scroll to Top