Volume 34

Issue 3

THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL LAWYERS CONVENTION — 2010
819	DIRECT DEMOCRACY: GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE?	Richard A. Epstein
827	ELECTIONS MATTER	Michael J. Gerhardt
837	HOW TO COUNT TO THIRTY‐FOUR: THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION	Michael Stokes Paulsen
873	ENTRENCHING GOOD GOVERNMENT REFORMS	Mark V. Tushnet
879	THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROPOSITION 8	Richard A. Epstein
Articles
889	EMBODIED EQUALITY: DEBUNKING EQUAL PROTECTION ARGUMENTS FOR ABORTION RIGHTS	Erika Bachiochi
951	THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL COST	Josh Blackman
1043	MAY LAWYERS BE GIVEN THE POWER TO ELECT THOSE WHO CHOOSE OUR JUDGES? “MERIT SELECTION” AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW	Nelson Lund
Notes
1071	WHAT’S THE HARM? NONTAXPAYER STANDING TO CHALLENGE RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
1099	WHY WE CANNOT ASK WHY: ETHICAL INDEPENDENCE AND VOTER INTENT
Recent Developments
1117	THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF FIREARM LEGISLATION IN THE WAKE OF McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010)
1131	MACHINEGUNNING REASON: SENTENCING FACTORS AND MANDATORY MINIMUMS IN United States v. O’Brien, 130 S. Ct. 2169 (2010)

Issue 2

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FIRST TWO YEARS: A LEGAL REFLECTION
421	HEAT EXPANDS ALL THINGS: THE PROLIFERATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION	Jonathan H. Adler
453	“ANYTHING BUT BUSH?”: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND GUANTANAMO BAY	Tung Yin
493	THE “FULL ACCESS DOCTRINE”: CONGRESS’S CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION	Vicki Divoll
543	PRIVATE REGULATION	Ronen Avraham
CORPORATE SPEECH AND ELECTORAL SPENDING
639	CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT BIG CORPORATIONS SHOULD HAVE BUT DO NOT WANT	Richard A. Epstein
663	FOREIGN NATIONALS, ELECTORAL SPENDING, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT	Toni M. Massaro
Articles & Essays
705	DAMAGES UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT: SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND A CALL FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORM	Alex Kardon
769	PROTECTING RELIGIONS FROM “DEFAMATION”: A THREAT TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS	Leonard A. Leo, Felice D. Gaer, & Elizabeth Cassidy
Notes
785	EVOLVING STANDARDS AS A JUDICIAL MANDATE: NECESSARY OR SUPERFLUOUS?
805	THE LOSS OF FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IN CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ, 130 S. CT. 2971 (2010)

Issue 1

THE TWENTY‐NINTH ANNUAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL STUDENT SYMPOSIUM—2010 ORIGINALISM 2.0
5	ARE ORIGINALIST CONSTITUTIONAL THEORIES PRINCIPLED, OR ARE THEY RATIONALIZATIONS FOR CONSERVATISM?	Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
29	IS ORIGINALISM TOO CONSERVATIVE?	Keith E. Whittington
45	TWO CHEERS, NOT THREE, FOR SIXTH AMENDMENT ORIGINALISM	Stephanos Bibas
53	ORIGINALISM AS AN ANCHOR FOR THE SIXTH AMENDMENT	Jeffrey L. Fisher
65	INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION	Randy E. Barnett
73	ORIGINALISM AND THE CONSTITUTION: DOES ORIGINALISM ALWAYS PROVIDE THE ANSWER?	Lino A. Graglia
89	ORIGINALISM AND HISTORY: THE CASE OF BOUMEDIENE V. BUSH	A. Raymond Randolph
99	INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION: ORIGINALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS	Kermit Roosevelt III
111	ORIGINALISM AND STARE DECISIS	Stephen Markman
121	ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT	John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport
129	ORIGINALISM, PRECEDENT, AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT	Jeffrey Rosen
137	ORIGINALISM, CONSERVATISM, AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT	David A. Strauss
149	DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT GUARANTEE EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL?	Steven G. Calabresi
Articles & Essays
157	WAS BORK RIGHT ABOUT JUDGES?	Thomas B. Griffith
171	GOOGLE AND THE LIMITS OF ANTITRUST: THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST GOOGLE	Geoffrey A. Manne & Joshua D. Wright
245	WHAT IS MARRIAGE?	Sherif Girgis, Robert P. George, & Ryan T. Anderson
289	SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM BY PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS AND THE RIGHTS OF DISSENTING EMPLOYEES UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT	Eric John Finseth
Coda
367	CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN GRAHAM V. FLORIDA?	Richard M. Re
Recent Developments
377	PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER IN Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010)
393	FEDERAL “PROCEDURAL” RULES UNDERMINE IMPORTANT STATE INTERESTS IN Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 130 S. Ct. 1431 (2010)
405	REMOVING CORPORATE CAMPAIGN FINANCE RESTRICTIONS IN Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010)