Per Curiam

Per Curiam

Justice Thomas Symposium

Celebrating Justice Clarence Thomas’s 30th Anniversary on the Supreme Court Symposium Foreword: Justice Thomas Joins the Supreme Court – Gregory G. Katsas Justice Thomas and Stare Decisis – Gregory E. Maggs Speaking Out on Justice Thomas – David R. Stras “Be Not Afraid” – James C. Ho Justice Thomas: Staunch Defender of Criminal Defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Amendments Rights – Liam P. Hardy and Margaret A. Ryan Saying What the Law Is, Justice Thomas Style […]

Per Curiam

What I Saw at the Daytona 500 – Nicole Stelle Garnett

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-7-Nicole-Stelle-Garnett-What-I-Saw-at-the-Daytona-500.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] What I Saw at the Daytona 500 Nicole Stelle Garnett*   I had the incredible good fortune of serving as Justice Clarence Thomas’s law clerk during the Supreme Court’s October 1998 term. It was the most formative year of my life.  My memories of the year—a year of learning lessons about life and the law, personal integrity and fortitude, formula racing and recreational vehicles (seriously)—remain a vivid mosaic seared forever

Per Curiam

Saying What the Law Is, Justice Thomas Style – Hon. Neomi Rao

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-6-Neomi-Rao-Saying-What-the-Law-Is-Justice-Thomas-Style.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] Saying What the Law Is, Justice Thomas Style Hon. Neomi Rao*   During his thirty years on the Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas has profoundly impacted how we think about the separation of powers and, in particular, has illuminated how aspects of the administrative state contravene the Constitution’s text and structure. In this short essay, I focus on the Justice’s methodology for spurring doctrinal shifts. Many judges stay only on

Per Curiam

Justice Thomas:  Staunch Defender of Criminal Defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Amendments Rights – Liam P. Hardy and Margaret A. Ryan

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-5-Liam-P.-Hardy-Margaret-A.-Ryan-Justice-Thomas-Staunch-Defender-of-Criminal-Defendants-Fifth-and-Sixth-Amendment-Rights.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] Justice Thomas:  Staunch Defender of Criminal Defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Amendments Rights Liam P. Hardy[*] and Margaret A. “Meg” Ryan[†]   In addition to receiving the incredible privilege of clerking for Justice Thomas, we have also both had the honor of serving as judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (USCAAF). Others will recount the joys of clerking for Justice Thomas: suffice to say that it

Per Curiam

“Be Not Afraid” – James C. Ho

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-4-James-C.-Ho-22Be-Not-Afraid22.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] “Be Not Afraid” by James C. Ho   In his three decades of service as a member of the Supreme Court of the United States, Justice Clarence Thomas has made countless contributions to the development of American law.  But his greatest influence on our nation transcends any one particular area of jurisprudence.  Perhaps the best way to capture Justice Thomas’s most important impact on the judiciary—and to celebrate his thirty-year

Per Curiam

Speaking Out on Justice Thomas – The Honorable David R. Stras

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-3-David-R.-Stras-Speaking-Out-on-Justice-Thomas.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] Speaking Out on Justice Thomas The Honorable David R. Stras   One of my fondest memories and greatest honors was having Justice Thomas swear me in as a judge. He did it not once, but twice, first when I joined the Minnesota Supreme Court over a decade ago and then again when I became a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The first time,

Per Curiam

Justice Thomas and Stare Decisis – Gregory E. Maggs

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-2-Gregory-E.-Maggs-Justice-Thomas-and-Stare-Decisis.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] Justice Thomas and Stare Decisis By Gregory E. Maggs[1]   This essay briefly describes and analyzes two aspects of Justice Clarence Thomas’s jurisprudence concerning the doctrine of stare decisis.  The first aspect is well-known from his judicial opinions: Justice Thomas, unlike his judicial colleagues, believes that the Supreme Court should never follow demonstrably erroneous precedent.[2]  The second aspect is less familiar but perhaps equally important: Justice Thomas insists on knowing

Per Curiam

Justice Thomas Joins the Supreme Court – The Honorable Gregory G. Katsas

[button link=”https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/wp-content/uploads/sites/90/2022/01/Fall-2021-No.-1-Gregory-G.-Katsas-Justice-Thomas-Joins-the-Supreme-Court.pdf” color=”red”] Download PDF[/button] Justice Thomas Joins the Supreme Court The Honorable Gregory G. Katsas[*]   I am delighted to offer a few memories of the nomination, appointment, and first Supreme Court term of Justice Clarence Thomas.  At that time, I served as one of his law clerks. * * * At 3:25 P.M. on Sunday, June 30, 1991, the telephone rang in the D.C. Circuit chambers of Judge Clarence Thomas.  I tensed up

Scroll to Top