Vols. 13-19
Volume 19 – Issue 3
Volume 19 – Issue 2
Volume 19 – Issue 1
Volume 18 – Issue 3
Volume 18 – Issue 2
Volume 18 – Issue 1
Volume 17 – Issue 3
Volume 17 – Issue 2
Volume 17 – Issue 1
Volume 16 – Issue 3
Volume 16 – Issue 2
Volume 16 – Issue 1
Volume 15 – Issue 3
Volume 15 – Issue 2
Volume 15 – Issue 1
Volume 14 – Issue 3
Volume 14 – Issue 2
Volume 14 – Issue 1
Volume 13 – Issue 3
Volume 13 – Issue 2
Volume 13 – Issue 1
Volume 19, Number 3 Spring 1996
Symposium
Group Rights, Victim Status, and the Law
The Eighth Annual Federalist Society Lawyers Convention
Opening Address
How Should Society Handle Injustice? Alan L. Keyes p. 645
Panel I: Victimology, Regulation, and the Transformation of the Common Law
Using Common Law Principles in Regulatory Schemes (With a Note on Victimology) Cass R. Sunstein p. 651
Regulatory Rent-Seekers in the Media, Bar, and Bureaucracy C. Boyden Gray p. 657
Self-Correction Mechanisms in the Regulatory System David C. Vladeck p. 661
Hope for the Tort System: Congressional Proposals for Reform Christopher Cox p. 667
Addresses
Victims and Heroes in the Benevolent State Clarence Thomas p. 671
Welfare As a Moral Problem Gertrude Himmelfarb p. 685
Panel II: Accused as Victim—the Case of Criminal Law
Victims and the Exclusionary Rule Daniel E. Lungren p. 695
Demystifying the Abuse Excuse: Is There One? Peter Arenella p. 703
Criminal Procedure: Moving from the Accused As Victim to the Accused Joseph D. Grano p. 711
Conservatives’ Selective Use of Race in the Law Randall L. Kennedy p. 719
Address
Address: Individualism before Multiculturalism Glenn C. Loury p. 723
Panel III: Feminism, Multiculturalism, and the Law
Women: An Uncertain Fit for the Multicultural Movement? Walter Berns p. 733
“I Want You:” Uncle Sam As Mr. Right Linda Chavez p. 739
From “Colorblind” White Supremacy to American Multiculturalism Jamin B. Raskin p. 743
Restructuring Work and Family Entitlements around Family Values Joan C. Wililams p. 753
Address
The D.C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race, and Ethnic Bias: Political Correctness Rebuffed Laurence H. Silberman p. 759
Panel IV: Affirmative Action—Moral Obligation and Practical Necessity, or the Road to Hell?
The Real Problem Abigail Thernstrom p. 767
Affirmative Action Is No Civil Right Robert Woodson p. 773
Three Models of Affirmative Action Beneficiaries Thomas W. Merrill p. 779
Closing Address
Improving Culture to End Racism: Closing Address Dinesh D’Souza p. 785
Article
How Do the Courts Really Discover Unenumerated Fundamental Rights? Cataloguing the Methods of Judicial Alchemy David Crump p . 795
Book Review
Utopia’s Law, Politics’ Constitution John C. Harrison 917
Recent Case
The United States Court of Appeals, 1995
The Scope and Constitutionality of Judicial Review Under the Tunney Act: United States v. Microsoft Corp., 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995) 941
Volume 19, Number 2 Winter 1996
Symposium
Originalism, Democracy, and the Constitution
The Fourteenth Annual National Student Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Poilcy—1995
Introductory Remarks
Welcoming Remarks Robert W. Bennett p. 237
Introductory Remarks Calabresi, Steven G. p. 239
Panel I: Originalism and the Dead Hand
Introduction Daniel D. Polsby p. 243
Dead Hand of the Architect Daniel A. Farber p. 245
Original Constitution and Our Origins McGinnis, John O. p. 251
Dead Hand of Constitutional Tradition Michael S. Moore p. 263
Dead Hand and Constitutional Amendment Lawrence G. Sager p. 275
Panel II: Constitutionalism and Originalism
Introduction
Stephen Chapman p. 281
Integrity and Impersonality of Originalism Lillian R. BeVier p. 283
It’s Not Constitutionalism, It’s Judicial Activism Lino A. Graglia p. 293
Originalism As an “Ism” Jonathan R. Macey p. 301
Five Theses on Originalism Cass R. Sunstein p. 311
Panel III: What Is Originalism?
Introduction: A View for the Legislative Branch David M. McIntosh p. 317
Originalism, Or Who Is Fred? Larry Alexander p. 321
A Text Is Just a Text Paul F. Campos p. 327
“Originalist” Values and Constitutional Interpretation Richard S. Kay p. 325
Defining Originalism Frederick Schauer p. 343
Panel IV: Is Originalism Possible? Normative Indeterminacy and the Judicial Role
Introduction Edwin Meese III p. 347
Nonoriginalist Perspective on the Lessons of History Michael C. Dorf p. 351
Some Doubts on Constitutional Indeterminacy Richard A. Epstein p. 363
Normative Indeterminacy and the Problem of Judicial Role Michael J. Perry p. 375
Writing of the Constitution and the Writing on the Wall Steven D. Smith p. 391
Panel V: Is Originalism Possible? Historical Indeterminacy
Introduction Stephen B. Presser p. 401
The Relevance of the Framers’ Intent Randy E. Barnett p. 403
Legal Indeterminacy: Its Cause and Cure Gary Lawson p. 411
Originalism and Indeterminacy Thomas B. McCaffee p. 429
The Indeterminacy of Historical Evidence Suzanna Sherry p. 437
Panel VI: The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
Did the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights Against States? Akhil Reed Amar p. 443
A Minimalist Approach to the Fourteenth Amendment Earl M. Maltz p. 451
The Originalist Case for Brown v. Board of Education Michael W. McConnell p. 457
Conservatives v. Originalism Jeffrey Rosen p. 465
Panel VII: Alternatives to Originalism Introduction John Fund p. 475
Alternatives to Originalism? Frank H. Easterbrook p. 479
Political Function of Originalist Ambiguity Richard H. Fallon Jr. p. 487
The Limited Relevance of Originalism in the Actual Performance of Legal Roles Sanford Levinson p. 495
Bork v. Burke Thomas W. Merrill p. 509
Interpretivism and the Judicial Role in a Constitutional Democracy: Seeking an Alternative to Originalism Martin H. Redish p. 525
Article
Truman, Korea, and the Constitution: Debunking the Imperial President Myth Robert F. Turner p. 533
Recent Developments
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1994 Term
Tearing Down the Wall: Rosenberger v. Rector of the University of Virginia, 115 S. Ct. 2510 (1995) p. 587
Protecting Private Religious Speech in the Public Forum: Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 115 S. Ct. 2440 (1995) p. 608
The Precarious Position of Commercial Speech: Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co., 115 S. Ct. 1585 (1995) p. 612
Recent Cases The United States Court of Appeals, 1995
Good Friday Vacation as an Establishment of Religion: Metzl v. Leininger, 57 F.3d 618 (7th Cir. 1995) p. 627
Speaking in Tongues: Whose Rights at Stake? Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995) (en banc) p. 634
Volume 19, Number 1 Fall 1995
Volume Introduction
Introduction to Volume Nineteen The Hon. Alex Kozinski p. 1
Articles
Interpreting the Constitution: Is the Intent of the Framers Controlling? If Not, What Is? Boris I. Bittker p. 9
Construction Union Use of Environmental Regulation to Win Jobs: Cases, Impact, and Legal Challenges Herbert R. Northrup & Augustus T. White p. 55
The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution of 1937 on the Dormant Commerce Clause: A Case Study in the Decline of State Autonomy Earl M. Maltz p. 121
At Last, the Supreme Court Solves the Takings Puzzle Douglas W. Kmiec p. 147
Recent Developments
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1994 Term
The Reemergence of the Commerce Clause as a Limit of Federal Power: United States v. Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995) p. 161
Federal Preculsion of State-Imposed Congressional Term Limits: U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 115 S. Ct. 1842 (1995) p. 174
Constitutional Limits on Racial Redistricting: Miller v. Johnson, 115 S. Ct. 2475 (1995) p. 200
Suspicionless Drug Testing and the Fourth Amendment: Vermonia School District 47J v. Acton, 115 S. Ct. 2386 (1995) p. 209
Recent Cases
The United States Court of Appeals, 1994-95
Bank Holding Companies and “The Business of Insurance:” Interpretations of McCarran-Ferguson in Owensboro National Bank v. Stephens, 44 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1994), and Barnett Bank v. Gallagher, 43 F.3d 631 (11th Cir. 1995) p. 271
Tilting the Table: Collective Bargaining After National Basketball Ass’n v. Williams, 45 F.3d 684 (2d Cir. 1995) p. 228
Volume 18, Number 3 Summer 1995
Articles
Access Demands to Pyament Systems Joint Ventures David A. Balto p. 623
The Politics of Corporate Governance Stephen M. Bainbridge p. 671
Harnessing the Free Market: Reinsurance Models for FDIC Deposit Insurance Pricing Anna Kuzmik Walker p. 735
Games Civil Contemnors Play Linda S. Beres p. 795
Stranded Costs William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak p. 835
Essay
A Lawyer Lectures a Judge Raoul Berger p. 851
Comment
Forbidden Favortism in the Government Accommodation of Religion: Grumet and the Case for Overturning Aguilar
Basilios E. Tsingos p. 867
Recent Developments
The Supreme Court of the United States 1993 & 1994 Terms
The Ever More Complicated “Actual Innocence” Gateway to Habeas Review: Schlup v. Delo, 115 S. Ct. 851 (1995) p. 889
Federal Preemption of State Consumer fraud Regulation, American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens, 115 S. Ct. 817 (1995) p. 903
The First Amendment and Cable Television: Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 114 S. Ct. 2445 (1995) p. 916
The Increased Need for Stronger Anti-Child Pornography Statutes in the Wake of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 115 S. Ct. 464 (1994) p. 929
Volume 18, Number 2 Spring 1995
Symposium
Feminism, Sexual Distinctions, and the Law
The Thirteenth Annual National Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Policy—1994
Introductory Remarks
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and the Role of Interdisciplinary Studies Robert E. Scott p. 321
Panel I: What Is Feminist Legal Theory?
Feminist Legal Theories Gary Lawson p. 325
Two Challenges for Feminist Thought Richard A. Epstein p. 331
Feminist Theory and Law Martha L. A. Fineman p. 349
Of Richard Epstein and Other Radical Feminists Mary Anne Case p. 369
Ideas Have Consequences Rosalie Silberman p. 409
Panel II: The Constitution on Sex
Gender Discrimination and the Original Understanding Earl M. Maltz p. 415
The Proposed Equal Protection Fix for Abortion Law:
Reflections on Citizenship, Gender, and the Constitution Anita L. Allen p. 419
Thoughts from a “Real” Woman Lillian R. BeVier p. 457
Women and the Constitution Akhil Reed Amar p. 465
Panel III: Among Friends and Colleagues: Harassment, Sex Discrimination, and Rape
The Promise and Problems of Sexual Harassment Litigation J. Harvie Wilkinson III p. 475
Unfree Speech Michael P. McDonald p. 479
Sexual Harassment: Ideology or Law? George Rutherglen p. 487
Panel IV: Feminism, Children and the Family
Introduction Laurence Silberman p. 501
Feminism, Children and the Family Elizabeth Fox-Genovese p. 503
The Housewife as Pariah F. Carolyn Graglia p. 509
Feminism and the Family Daniel R. Ortiz p. 523
Ozzie and Harriet Had it Right Daniel D. Polsby p. 531
Panel V: Women, Rational Choice, and Sexual Strategies
Evolution and Human Mating David M. Buss p. 537
Bargaining and Gender Carol M. Rose p. 547
Beyond “Having it All” Jennifer Roback Morse p. 565
Essay
Defending the Wall: Maintaining Church/State Separation in America Arlen Specter p. 575
Recent Developments
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1993 Term Dolan and the “Rough Proportionality” Standard: Taking its Toll on Loretto’s Bright Line: Dolan v. City of Tigard, 114 S. Ct. 2309 (1994) p. 591
Implied Liability Under § 10(b) of the Securities Act of 1934: Central Bank v. First Interstate Bank, 114 S. Ct. 1439 (1994) p. 603
Community Aesthetics and Speech Regulation: City of Ladue v. Gilleo, 114 S. Ct. 2038 (1994) p. 612
Volume 18, Number 1 Fall 1994
Articles
Are Congressional Term Limits Constitutional? Daniel Hays Lowenstein p. 1
The “Presumption of Constitutionality” Doctrine and the Rehnquist Court: A Lethal Combination for Individual Liberty David M. Burke p. 73
Etiquette Tips: Some Implications of “Process Federalism” Calvin R. Massey p. 175
The Case for Public Single-Sex Education Kristin S. Caplice p. 227
Book Review
The Partial Constitution or the Sunstein Constitution? David B. Rivkin, Jr. p. 293
Volume 17, Number 3 Summer 1994
Symposium on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof
Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue
Foreword: The Power of Presumptions Randy E. Barnett p. 613
How Presumptions Should Be Allocated
Burdens of Proof, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Modern Legal Discourse Ronald J. Allen p. 627
Civility and the Burden of Proof Dale A. Nance p. 647
Presumptions and Transcendentalism
You Prove It! Why Should I? Lawrence B. Solum p. 691
Defrocking the Courts: Resolving “Cases or Controversies,” Not Announcing Transcendental Truths Mark D. Rosen p. 715
The Enlightenment of Dialectics: Strategies Involved in Burdens of Proof Gregory M. Klass & Gustavo Faigenbaum p. 735
Presumptive Reasoning Applied to Legal Doctrine
Presumptions and Burdens of Proof as Tools for Legal Stability and Change Tamar Frankel p. 759
Default Presumptions in Legislation: Implementing Children;’s Services Richard H. Gaskins p. 779
Article
The Persistence of Local Legal Culture: Twenty Years of Evidence From the Federal Bankruptcy Courts Teresa A. Sullivan, Elizabeth Warren & Jay Lawrence Westbrook p. 801
Note
Unleashing RICO Matthew C. Blickensderfer p. 867
Recent Developments
Refining the Revlon Doctrine’s Applicability to Changes of Control: Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.3d 34 (Del. 1993) p. 895
Gestational Surrogacy and the Meaning of “Mother”: Johnson v. Calvert, 852 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1993) p. 907
The Graham Doctrine as a Weapon Against Substantive Due Process: Albright v. Oliver, 114 S. C.t 807 (1994) p. 918
The Lack of a Judicial Policy Addressing Maternal Drug Abuse Cases: Commonwealth v. Welch, 864 S.W.2d 280 (Ky. 1993) p. 929
Volume 17, Number 2 Spring 1994
Articles
Antitrust Immunity: State Action and Federalism, Petitioning and the First Amendment David McGowan & Mark A. Lemley p. 293
“Plain Meaning”: Justice Scalia’s Jurisprudence of Strict Statutory Construction Bradley C. Karkkainen p. 401
Qualified Immunity or Absolute Immunity? The Moral Hazards of Extending Qualified Immunity to Lower-Level Public Officials Evan J. Mandery p. 479
One Person, One Vote Revisited: Choosing A Population Basis to Form Political Districts Scot A. Reader p. 521
Comment
After Gillette: An Analysis of Premium Product Markets Under the 1992 Merger Guidelines
David J. Dadoun & Diana L. Dietrich P. 567
Annual I.H.S.-Eberhard Student Writing Competition Winner
A Contractual Approach to Data Privacy Steven A. Bibas p. 591
Volume 17, Number 1 Winter 1994
Symposium
Judicial Decision-Making: The Role of Text, Precedent, and the Rule of Law
Introductory Remarks
Judicial Decisionmaking and the Growth of the Law Robert C. Clark p. 1
Panel I: The Enterprise of Judging
The Diversity of the Federalist Society Morris S. Arnold p. 5
Judicial Restraint: An Argument From Institutional Design Lillian R. BeVier p. 7
The Enterprise of Judging Russell K. Osgood p. 13
Panel II: Stare Decisis and Constitutional Meaning
The Constitutional Case Against Precedent Gary Lawson p. 23
Reply to Lawson Charles Fried p. 35
On Lawson on Precedent Akhil Reed Amar p. 39
Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms Frederick Schauer p. 45
Panel III: Text and History in Statutory Construction
Introduction Paul R. Michel p. 57
Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation Frank H. Easterbrook p. 61
Dictionaries, Plain Meaning, and Context in Statutory Interpretation A. Raymond Randolph p. 71
Panel IV: Non-Legal Theory in Judicial Decisionmaking
“Legal” Versus “Non-Legal” Theory Stephen F. Williams p. 79
Non-Legal Theory in Judicial Decisionmaking Richard H. Fallon, Jr. p. 87
Moral Philosophy and the Glen Ridge Rape Case Linda R. Hirshman p. 101
The Persuasive Influence of Economic Analysis on Legal Decisionmaking Jonathan R. Macey p. 107
Roundtable: The Supreme Court as a Political Institution
Do Judges Have a Policy-Making Role in the American System of Government? Lino A. Graglia p. 119
The Judiciary: Conservatism’s Last Branch William Kristol p. 131
A Modest Proposal for a Political Court Thomas W. Merrill p. 137
The Supreme Court as a Partially Political Institution Stephen Reinhardt p. 149
Judges as Liars Martin Shapiro p. 155
Articles
Expediting Impeachment: Removing Article III Federal Judges After Criminal Conviction Michael J. Broyde p. 157
The Federal Government and the Problem of Chinese Rights in the Era of the Fourteenth Amendment Earl M. Maltz p. 223
Recent Developments
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1992 Term
Penalty Enhancement for Bias-Based Crimes: Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 113 S. Ct. 2194 (1993) p. 253
Animal Sacrifice and Equal Protection Free Exercise: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 113 S. Ct. 2217 (1993) p. 262
Federal Preemption of State Health and Safety Regulations: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood, 113 S. Ct. 1732 (1993) p. 273
Equal Protection and Race Conscious Reapportionment: Shaw v. Reno, 113 S. Ct. 2816 (1993) p. 283
Volume 16, Number 3 Autumn 1993
Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue
Symposium on Legal Formalism, 1992
Foreword: The Challenge of Legal Formalism Dennis M. Patteron p. 579
The Jurisprudence of Legal Formalism Ernest J. Weinrib p. 583
Professor Weinrib’s Formalism” The Not-So-Empty Sepulchre Stephen R. Perry p. 597
Legal Formalism from the Perspective of a Reasonable Law Professor Jean C. Love p. 627
Coherence and Formalism Ken Kress p. 639
Formalism and Practical Reason, or How to Avoid Seeing Ghosts in the Empty Sepulchre Ernest J. Weinrib p. 683
Notes
The Constitutionality of the False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provision James T. Blanch p. 701
Encouraging Product Safety Testing by Applying the Privilege of Self-Critical Analysis When Punitive Damages are Sought Paul B. Taylor p. 769
Recent Developments
Judicial Review of Impeachment Proceedings: Nixon v. United States, 113 S. Ct. 732 (1993) p. 809
Reapportionment and the Dilution of Minority Voting Strength: Growe v. Emison, 113 S. Ct. 1075 (1993), and Voinovich v. Quilter, 113 S. Ct. 1149 (1993) p. 820
Civil Forfeiture and the Innocent Owner Defense: United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave., 113 S. Ct. 1126 (1993) p. 835
Habeas Corpus and “Actual Innocence”: Herrera v. Collins, 113 S. Ct. 853 (1993) p. 848
Volume 16, Number 2 Spring 1993
Articles
“Thirty Pieces of Silver” for the Rights of Your People: Irresistible Offers Reconsidered as a Matter of State Constitutional Law William Van Alstyne p. 303
Private Interbank Discipline David G. Oedel p. 327
Recent Misinterpretations of the Avoidable Consequences Rule: The “Duty” to Mitigate and Other Fictions Jeffrey K. Riffer & Elizabeth Barrowman p. 411
De-Federalizing American Indian Commerce: Toward a New Political Economy for Indian Country Raymond Cross p. 445
The Supreme Court and Coerced Confessions: Arizona v. Fulminate in Perspective William Gangi p. 493
Essay
Manners Makyth Man: The Prose Style of Justice Scalia Charles Fried p. 529
Note
The American Bar Association: An Appearance of Propriety David M. Leonard p. 537
Book Review
Morton J. Horowitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy Steven C. Papkin p. 565
Volume 16, Number 1 Winter 1993
Symposium
The Legacy of the Federalist Papers
Foreword: Two Visions of the Nature of Man Steven G. Calabresi & Gary Lawson p. 1
Panel I: Philosophical Foundations of The Federalist: The Nature of Law and the Nature of Man
The Federalist Papers: The Framers Construct an Orrery Harold H. Bruff p. 7
The Federalist Papers: From Practical Politics to High Principle Richard A. Epstein p. 13
Philosophical Foundations of The Federalist Papers: Nature of Man and Nature of Law Mary Ann Glendon p. 23
Panel II: To Govern and Be Governed: The Federalist’s Vision of Representative Democracy
The Federalist Vision of a Representative Democracy James L. Ryan p. 33
Thoughts on the Federalist Vision of Representative Democracy as Viewed at the End of the Twentieth Century: How Have We Used the Legacy of The Federalist Papers? Jesse H. Choper p. 35
Remarks on The Federalist Number 10 David Epstein p. 43
Representative Democracy Jonathan R. Macey p. 49
Panel III: Liberty and Constitutional Architecture
Liberty and Constitutional Architecture James L. Buckley p. 55
Constitutional Architecture John S. Baker, Jr. p. 59
Individual Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Founders’ Prompt Correction of Their Own Mistake Douglas Laycock p. 75
Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Rights-Structure Paradigm Geoffrey P. Miller p. 87
Debate
The Federalist and the Contemporary Debate on Term Limits
Term Limitations: Breaking Up the Iron Triangle William Kristol p. 95
Some Arguments Against Congressional Term Limitations Nelso W. Polsby p. 101
Panel IV: The Anti-Federalists after 200 Years: Pundits or Prophets?
Introduction Edwin Meese III p.109
Anti-Federalists, The Federalist Papers, and the Big Argument for Union
“Independent of Heaven Itself”: Differing Federalist and Anti-Federalist Perspectives on the Centralizing Tendency of the Federal Judiciary Charles J. Cooper p. 119
From Federal Union to National Monolith: Mileposts in the Demise of American Federalism Lino A. Graglia p. 129
Epilogue
Federalism in the Twenty-First Century: Will States Exist? Pete du Pont p. 137
Articles
Easing the Pressure on Pressure Groups: Toward a Constitutional Right to Lobby Andrew P. Thomas p. 149
A Multi-disciplinary Analysis of the Structure of Persuasive Arguments Paul T. Wanergin p. 195
The Economic Analysis of the Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate Martin Zelder p. 241
Recent Developments
Revealing the Inadequacy of the Public Forum Doctrine: International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 112 S. Ct. 2701 (1992) p. 269
Establishment of Religion and High School Graduation Ceremonies: Lee v. Weisman, 112 S. Ct. 2649 (1992) p. 279
The Beginning of the End of Peremptory Challenges: Georgia v. McCollum, 112 S. Ct. 2348 (1992) p. 287
The Dormant Commerce Clause and the Interstate Shipmen of Waste: Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 112 S. Ct. 2019 (1992) p. 294
Volume 15, Number 3 Summer 1992
Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue
Symposium on Risks and Wrongs
University of San Diego, School of Law 1992
Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice Larry Alexander p. 621
Risks and Wrongs Jules L. Coleman p. 637
Rational Choice and the Law Jean Hampton p. 649
Jules and the Tortist David Gauthier p. 683
On the Domain and Market Rhetoric Margaret Jane Radin p. 711
The Relation Between Competition and Cooperation Steven Walt p. 733
Interpreting Torts, Explaining Contracts Alan Schwartz p. 747
The Primacy of Cooperation, Rational Bargaining, and an Economic Theory of Part of the Common Law Christopher T. Wonnell p. 771
Rational Bargaining Theory and Contract: Default Rules, Hypothetical Consent, the Duty to Disclose, and Fraud Randy E. Barnett p. 783
Efficiency and Rational Bargaining in Contractual Settings Richard Craswell p. 805
Why is Corrective Justice Just? Emily Sherwin p. 839
Jules Coleman and Corrective Justice in Tort Law: A Critique and Reformulation Kenneth W. Simons p. 849
Rational Contractarianism, Corrective Justice, and Tort Law Richard J. Arneson p. 889
The Mixed Conception of Corrective Justice Stephen R. Perry p. 917
Tort Law as a Comparative Institution: Reply to Perry Claire Finkelstein p. 939
Article
Natural Rights and the Constitution: The Original “Original Intent” Terry Brennan p. 965
Recent Developments
Limitations of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Presley v. Etowah County Commission, 112 S. Ct. 820 (1992) p. 1031
The Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Statements by Child Victims of Sexual Abuse: White v. Illinois, 112 S. Ct. 736 (1992) p. 1040
The Eighth Amendment in Section 1983 Cases: Hudson v. McMillian, 112 S. Ct. 995 (1992) p. 1050
Criminal Anti-Profit Statutes and the First Amendment: Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. New York Crime Victims Bd., 112 S. Ct. 501 (1991) p. 1060
Volume 15, Number 2 Spring 1992
Symposium
Free Market Environmentalism: The Role of the Market in Environmental Protection
Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College–1991
Free Market Versus Political Environmentalism Terry L. Anderson & Donald R. Leal p. 297
Debunking Wholesale Private Enforcement of Environmental Rights Edward Brunet p. 311
The Tragedy of the Commons, Part Two James E. Krier p. 325
Protecting the Environment from Orthodox Environmentalism James L. Huffman p. 349
The Fallacies of Free Market Environmentalism Michael C. Blumm p. 371
Behind Schedule and Over Budget: The Case of Markets, Water, and Environment Zach Willey p. 391
Property Rights, Environmental Resources, and the Future Richard L. Stroup & Sandra L. Goodman p. 427
A Property Rights Strategy for Protecting the Environment: A Comment on Stroup and Goodman Reuben C. Plantico p. 455
Bureaucratic Issues and Environmental Concerns: A Review of the History of Federal Land Ownership and Management Gary D. Libecap p. 467
Institutional Fantasylands: From Scientific Management to Free Market Environmentalism Peter S. Menell p. 489
Free Market Environmentalism: Wonder Drug or Snake Oil? William Funk p. 511
Escaping Environmental Feudalism Bruce Yandle p. 517
Article
The Worst Should Go First: Deferral Registries in Asbestos Litigation Peter H. Schuck p. 541
I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner
Back to the Future: The Supreme Court’s Retroactivity Jurisprudence Paul McGreal p. 595
Volume 15, Number 1 Winter 1992
Symposium
The Bill of Rights After 200 Years
Introductory Remarks
Coexistence and Co-Dependence: Conservatism and Civil Liberties Ralph K. Winter p. 1
What is the Federalist Society? Owen M. Fiss p. 5
Panel I: Should the Bill of Rights Fully Protect Fundamental Freedoms?
Three Levels of Human Decisionmaking and the Protection of Fundamental Rights William P. Barr p. 11
The Untenable Case for an Unconditional Right to Shelter Robert C. Ellickson p. 17
The Indivisibility of Liberty Under the Bill of Rights Richard A. Epstein p. 35
What Constitutes Full Protection of Fundamental Freedoms? Nadine Strossen p. 43
Panel II: How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Freedom and Civil Liberties?
How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Individual Freedoms? Theodore B. Olson p. 53
The Effectiveness of Bills of Rights John S. Baker, Jr. p. 55
Bills of Rights and Regression to the Mean Frank H. Easterbrook p. 71
The Role of Institutional Factors in Protecting Individual Liberties Thomas W. Merrill p. 85
The Bill of Rights in America and Central East Europe Herman Schwartz p. 93
Panel III: The Bill of Rights and Governmental Structure: Republicanism and Mediating Institutions
Some Comments on “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution” Akhil Reed Amar p. 99
On Madison and Majoritarianism: A Response to Professor Amar Walter Berns p. 113
On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial p. 199
The Role of Government Under the Bill of Rights Kate Smith p. 129
Panel IV: Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights
Interpreting the Bill of Rights: A Dichotomy of Jurisprudential Approaches Edwin D. Williamson p. 139
Originalism and the Bill of Rights Stephen L. Carter p. 141
How Should Courts Interpret the Bill of Rights? Lino A Graglia p. 149
An Interpretivist Agenda Gary S. Lawson p. 157
Debate
Should Congress Pass Legislation Overruling the Supreme Court’s Decision in the “Peyote Case,” Which Limits the Scope of the Free Exercise of Religion?
Religious Exercise: How Free? Edwin Meese III The Free Exercise Clause as a Rule About Rules John Harrison p. 169
Should Congress Pass Legislation Restoring the Broader Interpretation of Free Exercise of Religion? Michael W. McConnell p. 181
Articles
Microenterprise: Human Reconstruction in America’s Inner Cities Lewis D. Solomon p. 191
The Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading: A Legal, Economic, and Ethical Analysis Steven R. Salbu p. 223
Recent Developments
The U.S. Supreme Court, 1990 Term
Inferring Actual Malice from Altered Quotations, Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 111 S. Ct. 2419 (1991) p. 255
Confidential Media Sources and the First Amendment: Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., 111 S. Ct. 2513 (1991) p. 266
The Death Penalty and Victim Impact Evidence: Payne v. Tennessee, 11 S. Ct. 2597 (1991) p. 275
Proportionality and the Eight Amendment: Harmelin v. Michigan, 111 S. Ct. 2680 (1991) p. 284
Volume 14, Number 3 Summer 1991
Symposium on Law and Philosophy Sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies
Foreword: Unenumerated Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Randy E. Barnett p. 615
Rules and the Rule of Law Frederick Schauer p. 645
The Gap Larry Alexander p. 695
Rules and Social Facts Jules L. Coleman p. 703
Comment: Legal Theory and the Role of Rules Ruth Gavison p. 727
Three Concepts of Rules Michael S. Moore p. 771
Positivism, I Presume? . . . Comments on Schauer’s “Rules and Rule of Law” Gerald J. Postema p. 797
Presumptive Positivism and Trivial Cases Margaret Jane Radin p.823
The Rules of Jurisprudence: A Reply Frederick Schauer p. 839
Note
Footnote 6: Justice Scalia’s Attempt to Impose a Rule of Law on Substantive Due Process Gregory C. Cook p. 853
Recent Developments
Extension to the Right to Counsel: Minnick v. Mississippi, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990) p. 895
Regulation of Racist Speech: In re Welfare of R.A.V., 464 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1991) p. 903
Sanctioning Clients Under Rule 11: Business Guides Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc., 111 S. Ct. 922 (1991) p. 913
Section 1983 Claims Involving Commerce Clause Violations: Dennis v. Higgins, 111 S. Ct. 865 (1991) p. 924
Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases: Cheek v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 604 (1991) p. 931
Volume 14, Number 2 Spring 1991
Symposium
American Education: Legal and Policy Issues
What’s Wrong With Our Universities? Derek Bok p. 305
What’s Wrong With Our Universities? An Additional View A. Kenneth Pye p. 335
Achieving Our National Education Goals: Overarching Strategies Lauro F. Cavazos p. 355
Becoming Preeminent in Education: America’s Greatest Challenge Augustus F. Hawkins p. 367
The Value of Private Property in Education: Innovation, Production, and Employment Philip K. Porter & Michael L. Davis p. 397
What Is a Teacher’s Job?: An Examination of the Social and Legal Causes of Role Expansion and Its Consequences Judith H. Cohen p. 427
Is Local Control of the Schools Still a Viable Option? Charles F. Faber p. 447
Judicial Review of the Special Educational Program Requirements Under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Be Going? Dixie Snow Huefner p. 483
School Finance Litigation: A New Wave of Reform Julie K. Underwood & William E. Sparkman p. 517
Academic Tenure: An Economic Critique Robert W. McGee & Walter E. Block p. 545
Leaving Them Speechless: A Critique of Speech Restrictions on Campus Kathryn Marie Dessayer & Arthur J. Burke p. 565
I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner
The Imbalance of Power and the Presidential Veto: A Case for the Item Veto Diane-Michele Krasnow p. 583
Volume 14, Number 1 Winter 1991
Symposium
The Future of Civil Rights Law
Panel I: What Are Civil Rights and to Whom Do They Belong?
Introduction: Civil Rights Politics as Interest-Group Politics Daniel B. Rodriguez p. 1
Some Observations on Broadly Construing Civil Rights Laws Charles A. Shanor p. 8
Women’s Rights and Social Wrongs Deborah L. Rhode p. 13
Civil Rights, Human Rights, Gay Rights: Minorities and the Humanity of the Different Evan Wolfson p. 21
Panel II: The Role of Government in Closing the Socio-Economic Gap for Minorities
The Impact of Federal Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks John J. Donahue III p. 41
Addressing the Gap: Some Thoughts on the Government’s Role Jeffery Robinson p. 53
The Separation of Race and States Jennifer Roback p. 58
Panel III: The Effects Test–Forced Quotas or Elimination of Racism?
Introduction: The Age of Ambiguity Lawrence J. Siskind p. 65
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: From Prohibiting to Requiring Racial Discrimination in Employment Lino A. Graglia p. 68
Proving Discriminatory Intent in Constitutional Law Disparate Impact Cases William Cohen p. 78
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio: A Step Toward Eliminating Quotas in the American Workplace Charles J. Cooper p. 84
Competing Conceptions of “Racial Discrimination”: A Response to Cooper and Graglia Randall L. Kennedy p. 93
Panel IV: The Limits on Judicial Power in Ordering Remedies
Civil Rights and Remedies Frank H. Easterbrook p. 103
The Limitlessness of Judicial Capacity to Right Constitutional Wrongs Michael H. Sussman p. 112
Judicial Remedies: Braking the Power to Fix It William Bradford Reynolds p. 120
Panel V: New Frontiers in Civil Rights
Introduction: A Walk Through the Civil Rights World R. Gaull Silberman p. 129
On the Right to Be Sheltered from the “Right to Die” Hadley Arkes p. 131
Unfinished Business: A Civil Rights Strategy for America’s Third Century Clint Bolick p. 137
Civil Rights and the New Federal Judiciary: The Retreat from Fairness Stephen Reinhardt p. 142
Civil Rights, Economic Progress, and Common Sense Edwin Meese III p. 150
Panel VI: Civil Rights, Civility, and Free Speech–What Takes Precedence?
Discriminatory Harassment and Free Speech Thomas C. Grey p. 157
Freedom Through Moral Education Alan L. Keyes p. 165
Articles
The Exclusionary Rule and the Meaning of Separation of Powers Ruth W. Grant p. 173
The Social Costs of Populist Antitrust: A Public Choice Perspective Michael E. DeBow p. 205
Book Review
The Clerisy of Power (review of Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law) David B. Sentelle p. 225
Recent Developments
The U.S. Supreme Court, 1989 Term
Abortion Parental Notification Statutes: Hodgson v. Minnesota, 110 S. Ct. 2926 (1990) and Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 110 S. Ct. 2972 (1990) p. 237
Constitutional Protection of the “Refusal-of-Treatment”: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 110 S. Ct. 2841 (1990) p. 248
Equal Protection and Affirmative Action in Broadcast Licensing: Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 110 S. Ct 2997 (1990) p. 259
Federal Judicial Authority to Increase Local Taxes: Missouri v. Jenkins, 110 S. Ct. 2997 (1990) p. 270
Free Exercise of Religion: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith, 110 S. Ct. 1595 (1990) p. 282
Political Patronage and the First Amendment: Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990) p. 292
Volume 13, Number 3 Summer 1990
Symposium on Law and Philosophy Sponsored by the Institute for Human Studies
Forward: Owning Ideas Dale A. Nance p. 757
What is Property? Boudewijn Bouckaert p. 775
Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects Tom G. Palmer p. 817
Economic Incentives in Markets for Information and Innovation Ejan Mackaay p. 867
Patents, Copyrights , and Trademarks: Property or Monopoly? Roger E. Meiners & Robert J. Staaf p. 911
Note
A “Frightful Political Dragon” Indeed: Why Constitutional Challenges Cannot Subdue the Gerrymander Allan B. Moore p. 949
Recent Developments
Child Abuse and the Fifth Amendment: Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight, 110 S. Ct. 900 p. 1017
Double Jeopardy, Due Process, and Evidence from Prior Acquittals: Dowling v. United States, 110 S. Ct. 668 (1990) p. 1027
Foreigners, Foreign Property, and the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 110 S. Ct. 1056 (1990) p. 1037
Legislative Immunity and City Councils: Spallone v. United States, 110 S. Ct. 625 (1990) p. 1049
Race-Based Peremptory Challenges and the Sixth Amendment: Holland v. Illinois, 110 S. Ct. 803 (1990) p. 1061
Volume 13, Number 2 Spring 1990
Symposium
Labor & Employment Law in the 1990s
Forward Charles Fried The Railway Labor Act—Time for Repeal? Herbert R. Northup Unions, Politics and Public Policy: A (Somewhat) Revisionist Approach Dan. C. Heldman Will a More Interventionist NLRA Revive Organized Labor? Leo Troy Revolution Ahead: Communications Workers v. Beck
Rex H. Reed A Subjectivist Economic Analysis of Government-Mandated Employee Benefits Don Bellante & Philip K. Porter AIDS in the Workplace: Public and Corporate Policy Marian V. Heacock & Gregory P. Orvis
Note
Age Discrimination, Wages, and Economics: What Judicial Standard? Peter H. Harris p. 715
Volume 13, Number 1 Winter 1990
Symposium
Property: The Founding, the Welfare States, and Beyond
Panel I: The Idea of Property
Introduction: Property and Justice Tom Bethell p. 1
Property and Necessity Richard A. Epstein p. 2
National Rights and Property Rights Ellen Frankel Paul p. 10
Debate
Liability—The New “New Property”
Introduction: Of Profligacy, Piracy, and Private Property Alex Kozinski p. 17
Who Owns the Cherry Pit? Peter Huber p. 22
Tort Law and Deterrence: A Response to Dr. Huber Joseph A. Page p. 30
Panel II: Property and the Constitution
Forty Acres and a Mule: A Republican Theory of Minimal Entitlements Akhil Reed Amar p. 37
Protecting Property—Law and Politics Charles Fried p. 44
Private Property and Public Office Jeremy Rabkin p. 54
Property as Politics Frederick Schauer p. 60
Panel III: Regulation and Property–Allies or enemies?
Three Systems of Land-Use Control Robert C. Ellickson p. 67
The (Unlikely) Death for Property James E. Krier p. 75
Takings Analysis of Regulations Gale A. Norton p. 84
Privprop, Regprop, and Beyond Richard B. Stewart p. 91
Panel IV: Intellectual and Informational Property Rights
Introduction: Property in Mass Media Law Lee C. Bollinger p. 97
Owning What Doesn’t Exist Stephen L. Carter p. 99
Intellectual Property is Still Property Frank H. Easterbrook p. 108
Property Rights in Inventions, Writings, and Marks Edmund W. Kitch p. 119
Panel V: Ownership of Life
Surrogate Motherhood from the Perspective of Family Law Carl E. Schnierer p. 125
The Social Utility of Surrogacy Peter H. Schuck p. 132
Surrogacy, Slavery, and the Ownership of Life Anita L. Allen p. 139
The Personhood of Unborn Children: A First Principle in “Surrogate Motherhood” Analysis Walter M. Weber p. 150
Final Address
Rights and Realism—Making the Constitution Work Edwin Meese III
Articles
Regulation: Past Present, and Future Robert W. Hahn p. 167
Confirmation Ethics: President Reagan’s Nominees to the United States Supreme Court Steven Lubet p. 229
Note
Judicial Restrain and the Non-Decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Christopher A Crain p. 263
Comments
The Constitutionality of the Delaware Anti-Takeover States C. William Baxley p. 319
Judge versus Professor: Frank Easterbrook and the Wisconsin Anti-Takeover Statute Douglas L. Madsen p. 355
Recent Developments
The U.S. Supreme Court, 1988 Term
Constitutional Limits to Punitive Damage Awards: Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 109 S. Ct. 2909 (1989) p. 369
Disparate Impact Doctrine Revisited: Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 109 S. Ct. 2115 (1989) p. 383
Religious Displays and the First Amendment: County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, 109 S. Ct. 3086 (1989) p. 399
Youth, Mental Retardation, and Capital Punishment: Penry v. Lynaugh, 109 S. Ct. 2934 (1989) and Stanford v. Kentucky, 109 S. Ct. 2969 (1989) p. 415