The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito: A Symposium
JLPP: Per Curiam is proud to present The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito: A Symposium. The essays in this symposium, authored by prominent federal judges and renowned academics, focus in-depth on Justice Alito’s approaches to a wide variety of areas of law.
Versions of most of these essays were presented as addresses at a March 2022 symposium convened by Professor Robert P. George and Yuval Levin, co-hosted by the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University and the American Enterprise Institute. An additional essay was later commissioned to analyze Justice Alito’s opinion for the Court in Dobbs.
The essays in this symposium can be accessed at the following links:
- Introduction: The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito – Robert P. George
- The Originalist Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito – J. Joel Alicea
- The Contextual Textualism of Justice Alito – John O. McGinnis
- Judge Alito’s First Amendment Vigilance on the Third Circuit – Hon. Stephanos Bibas
- The Prudent Judge – Hon. Steven Menashi
- Erie and Contemporary Federal Courts Doctrine – Jack Goldsmith
- Justice Alito on Criminal Law – Kate Stith
- Justice Alito on Criminal Procedure – Hon. Andrew S. Oldham
- Justice Alito: A Justice of Foxes and Hedgehogs – Hon. Amul Thapar
- An Architect of Religious Liberty Doctrines for the Roberts Court – Gabrielle Girgis
- Samuel Alito’s Conservatism—Burkean and American – Adam J. White
- Reason and Fiat in the Jurisprudence of Justice Alito – Adrian Vermeule
- Justice Alito’s Free Speech Jurisprudence – Keith E. Whittington
- The Elevation of Reality over Restraint in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization – Kevin C. Walsh
Trackbacks/Pingbacks